It was time for my renewal for standard first aid (SFA) and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) so I registered for the 2-day course and completed my certification last week. This is a requirement to perform injections, but also an expectation as a health professional in the field. Every workplace location should have a trained individual on site at all times.
Is it just me, or does the training seem to change every year?
My first foray into first aid was to earn a badge as a cub scout. One of our group leaders was a trainer with St. John Ambulance and I recall it took place at someone’s house. There were about a dozen of us around the age of 8-10. I only retained a few items from that session: the constant warning of the graphic videos they could have shown us, how to tie a tourniquet, and just how scared to death I was to be confronted with a true first aid situation.
There was so much to remember. During the demonstrations where someone would have to take charge, we all looked at each other with eyes as wide as dinner plates. Almost everyone forgot at least one aspect of the primary survey (introducing yourself as a first-aider, determining multiple casualties, removing hazards, etc.). When manipulating limbs for splints and bandaging, the wrong hand placement led to drops or contortions that would probably do more harm than good. For the CPR component, we would disagree on timing of breaths or whether to do chest compressions first. This was well before the Good Samaritan Act so there was hesitation for fear of doing the wrong thing in the wrong order.
Since then, the training seems to have evolved to be more of a ‘stay calm and collected, assert control, and remember that you’re trying to help the person’. It’s a welcome switch, but watching the scenarios played in the videos are thorough to the point of no longer feeling like an emergency situation. For example, a young girl cuts her hand lengthwise in the kitchen and calls for help. Presumably the father comes in assesses the scene by asking her if anyone else was hurt and check her breathing. He then gloves up and proceeds to check the shoulder all the way down to the arm. The girl does not appear alarmed. By all accounts, this is of course the proper way to perform first aid, but if I was the casualty, I’d wonder why we were spending time doing a head-to-toe assessment. I imagine some folks would be a bit scared and hysterical as well.
CPR is much more simplified. For all cases, a 30:2 compression-to-breath ratio is easy to remember. For choking, the Heimlich Maneouvre (or abdominal thrusts) seemed to have fallen out of favour due to lack of evidence of effectiveness, but is being taught again in combination with back blows. Nose bleeds used to be pinching the nostrils with the head tilted back, but is now angled forward. Shock wasn’t discussed at length like before; if you treat the injury/injuries, then that’s the best way to minimize the effects of shock. Pen devices that administer epinephrine and AEDs are much more direct and straightforward when taught. My biggest disappointment is that tourniquets are no longer in the curriculum; I thought those were pretty cool. Ring pads are out of favour too, as they tend to be unstable on a wound. Pre-fabricated ring pads used to be part of a first aider’s kit. Who knew?
So I should be in good shape for another few years with a re-certification in between. Here’s hoping it’s a set of skills that will be needed infrequently. Should I find myself in a crisis situation, this training may make the difference between a favorable and a catastrophic outcome.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any agency, employer or affiliation.